GHOSTS EXIST!. RANDI VERSUS
OKTAR
Ghosts exist and are among
us, this claim that seems implausible is about to
be proven, just look at the data I leave you below and judge for
yourselves.
«James Randi E.F.» offers
«One Million Dollars» to anyone who can scientifically demonstrate a
paranormal phenomenon, but be careful, under appropriate scientific conditions,
this means it must be a test subject to rigorous controls, for example if someone guessed the
lottery number they would have to achieve it enough times to
assert that they deserve the prize. It hardly matters if it is a notable circumstance, because science does not measure the
importance of an event it is rather about seeing how many times it occurs and if
it is chance, absurd but true. I'm sorry
for the prophets of the end of the world, 3 or 4 ends of the world would have to occur
to be considered serious and accurate.
Randi expects Schrödinger's cat to appear 100%
of the time alive, that's his way of understanding science.
The reality is this, this gentleman Randi already stated long ago that no one
would ever be able to pass the test and that he was quite comfortable not having to
disburse that money.
Randi was a professional magician and mentalist
and illusionist, it seems he applied his knowledge well
to the media world, although he was not too well known, he managed to
carve out an international niche by challenging and publicly calling Uri Geller a
charatan, (possibly uses mentalist tricks like Randi) for which reason
he has been in lawsuits for more than a decade, the fact is that this
international fame and the subsequent published books on frauds etc. Removed him
from his previous activities and seem like an endless source of income
, it is known that attacking paranormal sectors sells, Randi
achieved his notoriety because of people who claim to have psychic powers
Undoubtedly there are many
scammers in the paranormal sector, but also many scientists who
signed a declaration in favor of creationism for example, go in and you will see hundreds and hundreds of them, let it be clear that it is not my case, I am an astrologer and I believe that there is an evolution in nature.
Following in Geller's footsteps.
Being a media figure
accused in many cases of fraud due to
his way of bending spoons, Uri
Geller and he has an enormous fortune that he explains he obtained thanks to various companies hiring him to find gold, oil and different
resources hidden, he has also
written numerous books on the subject. Geller is Randi's main supporter, Randi's fortune is precisely Geller, and no scientific study
is necessary to prove it.
ANOTHER GHOST NAMED Adnan Oktar.
This man, for those who don't know, is
born in Ankara, and offers the whopping sum of 6 TRILLION DOLLARS, with a capital B,
to whoever proves that we come from our relatives the primates, he will give them
to that scientist who presents him with a fossil from the intermediate stage in the
evolution process.
It is about slapping
Darwin's theory of evolution, a similar idea already came from an American
although the amount was much smaller.
There are, as in Randi's case,
many pressure groups that offer various prizes and if we add up the
prizes offered we have good reasons to find some evidence in accordance
with the requirements of this bet, what is curious is that a priori it is something
possible.
But of course in this case too
we have to look at the fine print, hardly anyone gives millions and millions away like
they were mint candies, the fact is that he enjoys wide popularity in
his country, these types of
characters usually have it, if we really look at what Randi and Adnan
Oktar are doing we will discover that it is a gigantic marketing
campaign aimed at a very diverse audience, I would add that a successful campaign in terms of the benefit that international popularity brings.
This character Oktar is more
dangerous than the previous one, not because he differs too much in his way of achieving
notoriety from Randi, but rather because he possesses many more resources than the
former and manages to use them to subject the public to the monopoly of his reason,
managing in many cases to silence the diversity of opinions, quite an element.